E85Forum.com Forum Index E85Forum.com
Fueling the E85 community
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Success?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    E85Forum.com Forum Index -> open forum on E85 ethanol fuel
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
imprezarsc



Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 87

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 9:01 am    Post subject: Success? Reply with quote

I posted this everywhere but here....

I've (so far!!!) successfully implemented the use of factory parts to create an E85 powered Subaru RS. I swapped in new 440 WRX injectors to replace my 280cc stock ones. I also installed new o2 sensors since the others were shot, as well as colder plugs with a tight gap. It retains the factory ecu, all sensors, and all engine parts.

Just WOW! It's hard to believe the car does THIS. I have yet to go back to the dyno, but I can assure you this is faster than it was on the old ethanol tune. I should have done it like this a long time ago. To still have used all factory parts and the ECU doesn't complain and the car runs beautifully? Someone, or several people, thought of this at the factory before I came across it. It works too well to be an accident.

I wish the factories would come out with reprogramming and services regarding flex-fuel conversions and ethanol usage. The EPA, marketing, and lawyers stand in the way though. america is stifling it's own creativity through too many special interest groups bickering about their own special interest. Doing a conversion like this is illegal because laws were written that way by the same men now encouraging developments like these. That total hypocrisy drives people away from developing new technologies and ideas. What incentive do people have to be creative when lawsuit vultures circle over good ideas? Self-centered letigious purposes do the greater good NO GOOD AT ALL! One special interest group could be in line to sue you, gather your information, and pass it on to another interest group they're friends with who in turn kicks back profits or donations to the original group that put a hard working person or people out of business.

If someone with any pull is reading this...stop the madness. We're cluster-fucking ourselves with debates rather than taking any action.
_________________
http://www.grantouringlabs.com My ethanol conversion and tuning site.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Revision



Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 194
Location: Carol Stream, IL

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 2:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The car manufacturers are using the EPA regulations on converting gasoline cars to E85 as an excuse to get people to buy E85 capable vehicles instead of converting them over to E85. The EPA really hasn't shown interest in shutting down the illegal conversion of cars or else they would have gone after several producers of aftermarket turbo kits and such which remove OEM catalytic converters and install larger injectors and change the ignition timing. Frankly, there are more people out there with illegal header back modifications than there are people running E30 or E85 in a gasoline vehicle.

But, in a sense you are correct about the current business culture of stifling out innovation. Which is why there are anonymous forums such as this for conversing about theoretical ideas about converting a car to E85. Wink

And remember, while you are being arrested, to wave and smile to the reporters and the cameras and proclaim loudly that you are a political target of big business and bad government and that it is the fault of President (whoever is in office at the time) for leading the country into ruin. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hotrod



Joined: 19 Apr 2005
Posts: 812
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Fri May 26, 2006 12:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The car manufacturers are using the EPA regulations on converting gasoline cars to E85 as an excuse to get people to buy E85 capable vehicles instead of converting them over to E85.


Quote:
And remember, while you are being arrested, to wave and smile to the reporters and the camera


We will be in good company though Wink
Source -- http://autonet.ca/Environment/story.cfm?story=/Environment/2006/05/23/1593494-ap.html
Quote:
Automakers warn against E85 use

by Dee-Ann Durbin, Associated Press posted May 22, 2006


ROCHESTER, Mich. (AP) — Automakers said Monday they are trying to get more ethanol-capable vehicles on the road quickly, but warned that consumers in the meantime should not use an E85 ethanol blend in conventional vehicles or try to convert their vehicles to use E85.
...

U.S. Rep. Stephanie Herseth, D-S.D., said she fills up her conventional vehicle with a blend of about 30 percent ethanol and has been happy with its performance.


Quote:
Herseth also asked about the cost of converting a conventional vehicle to one that can run on E85. Susan Cischke, Ford's vice president for environmental and safety engineering, responded that it's illegal for consumers to try to convert conventional vehicles because they won't be able to meet federal emissions standards once they're converted.


I suggest one of our members from the great state of South Dakota contact Rep. Herseth's office and point them to this forum and advise them that there is a ground swell of plain old folks out there that are not going to wait for the EPA, Congress and the Manufactures to get their collective heads out of their butts and make it legal to convert the cars we already own to run on E85.

If they wait long enough to fix this problem they won't have to worry about it any more because the general public will vote people into office that will!!

We should have started moving to E85 33 years ago. Failing to do that has cost the U.S. 100's of billions of dollars in lost revenue that has gone over seas to build fancy palaces, and resorts in the desert. We also lost billions in dollars of productivity in the late 70's and early 80's and every few years since as successive "oil shocks" have broke the back of countless small businesses due to transportation energy costs Not to mention who knows how many farm families and their support communities that have evaporated when they could have made a good living on fuel ethanol. The 1970's oil crisis forced a lot of small self employed workers into bankruptcy including my brother --- so I have a personal perspective on what this countries energy addiction costs people in the long run.

We can strike now while the iron is hot, or wait until some other oil despot gets cranky (cough) Venezula (cough) and tries to strangle us with oil.
I prefer the proactive approach myself.

Regarding cost of conversions ---

Quote:
http://www.ransac.org/Projects%20and%20Publications/News/Nuclear%20News/414200623353PM.html



U.S. REPRESENTATIVE DAVID HOBSON (R-OH) HOLDS A HEARING ON FISCAL YEAR 2007 APPROPRIATIONS FOR ENERGY SUPPLY, CONSERVATION, AND FOSSIL ENERGY PROGRAM
Federal News Service
4/5/2006
(for personal use only)

COMMITTEE: ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT AND RELATED AGENCIES SUBCOMMITTEE
SUBCOMMITTEE: HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE
SPEAKER:
U.S. REPRESENTATIVE DAVID HOBSON (R-OH), CHAIRMAN

WITNESSES:
DAVID GARMAN, UNDERSECRETARY OF ENERGY FOR ENERGY, SCIENCE, AND ENVIRONMENT

KEVIN KOLEVAR, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF ELECTRICITY AND ENERGY ASSURANCE, DEPARMENT OF ENERGY
ALEXANDER "ANDY" KARSNER, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF ENERGY FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY, AND RENEWABLE ENERGY
DENNIS SPURGEON, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF ENERGY FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY
GEORGE RUDINS, DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF ENERGY, FOR COAL AND POWER SYSTEMS


GARMAN: Yes. Our capacity to put flexible-fuel vehicles on the road that burn E85 exceeds our capacity to supply them with E85. It's a relatively easy thing to make a vehicle E85 compatible. It's unit cost of under $100 per vehicle.



Larry
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Revision



Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 194
Location: Carol Stream, IL

PostPosted: Fri May 26, 2006 7:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
To still have used all factory parts and the ECU doesn't complain and the car runs beautifully? Someone, or several people, thought of this at the factory before I came across it. It works too well to be an accident.


You drive a Subaru. Laughing
Subaru has been reusing their old parts bin for so long that its no surprise that everything is nearly backwards compatible. Your model year 2000 has a 10 or 11 year history of parts going backwards plus all the various performance models in the GC8 chassis using the turbo 2.0 motors.

E85 has nearly the same timing requirements as gasoline, it just requires more volume of it to run stoic. The Subaru ECU on the RS seems to be able to handle almost 30% adjustment for injectory duty plus the fact that E85 is happier running rich (one of the guys was running 50/50 E85/Gasoline before CEL). I also know that the RS will make a lot of power when the knock sensor isn't working completely properly.. (don't ask how I know this) So it will take some advantage of E85s higher octane by adding timing. Your model year 2000 RS also has a higher compression rating than the older RSs. I believe it is 10.5:1 nearly perfect for use with E85.

Basically you have a huge coincidence and luck factor in assembling your parts, so put the tin-foil hat away and enjoy it. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
imprezarsc



Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 87

PostPosted: Fri May 26, 2006 8:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

But but but....

I get such good reception with it! Leave my tin-foil hat alone. MOOOMMMMMM! Wink Razz.

Seriously, though, the engine is set up quite well from the factory to make use of it. It's 10:1 compression, btw Wink. I ran against a friend's turbo swapped RS last night (2.0L, stock turbo, top mt. w/ catback ex.). He's got me by about a full second in the 1/4 the best we can tell. I shift at 6k, his at 7k and we're both using the same 4.11 gears w/ 5-spd. Every time he pulled on me was when I shifted and he didn't have to, otherwise we were right at each others door. His power is all up top. My car has plenty of low end and midrange grunt. It wasn't really apples to oranges...more like lemons to limes Laughing. We both liked swapping rides around to compare. Good times.

What was surprising was when we got back to his house. Now that he has his WRX parts swapping done, he can upgrade all the stock stuff. A TXS stage 4 with a new turbo, pipes, injectors, unichip, etc. It's all street legal stuff. What kinda angered me a little bit was that in that parts list (injectors and ECU tuning.) was everything needed to run ethanol fuel anyway. I can't reiterate enough that it's only a matter of retuning, not trying to capture a piece of the sun. Larry's quote proves that the government already knows the capabilities are there in the stock systems. Why not let us use it?

(Quoting the gub'mt at their own game is priceless....Wink)

Quote:
http://www.ransac.org/Projects%20and%20Publications/News/Nuclear%20News/414200623353PM.html



U.S. REPRESENTATIVE DAVID HOBSON (R-OH) HOLDS A HEARING ON FISCAL YEAR 2007 APPROPRIATIONS FOR ENERGY SUPPLY, CONSERVATION, AND FOSSIL ENERGY PROGRAM
Federal News Service
4/5/2006
(for personal use only)

COMMITTEE: ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT AND RELATED AGENCIES SUBCOMMITTEE
SUBCOMMITTEE: HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE
SPEAKER:
U.S. REPRESENTATIVE DAVID HOBSON (R-OH), CHAIRMAN

WITNESSES:
DAVID GARMAN, UNDERSECRETARY OF ENERGY FOR ENERGY, SCIENCE, AND ENVIRONMENT
KEVIN KOLEVAR, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF ELECTRICITY AND ENERGY ASSURANCE, DEPARMENT OF ENERGY
ALEXANDER "ANDY" KARSNER, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF ENERGY FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY, AND RENEWABLE ENERGY
DENNIS SPURGEON, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF ENERGY FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY
GEORGE RUDINS, DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF ENERGY, FOR COAL AND POWER SYSTEMS


GARMAN: Yes. Our capacity to put flexible-fuel vehicles on the road that burn E85 exceeds our capacity to supply them with E85. It's a relatively easy thing to make a vehicle E85 compatible. It's unit cost of under $100 per vehicle.
_________________
http://www.grantouringlabs.com My ethanol conversion and tuning site.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
specialgreen
Site Admin


Joined: 10 Jul 2004
Posts: 257
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

PostPosted: Sun May 28, 2006 1:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Quote:
And remember, while you are being arrested, to wave and smile to the reporters and the camera


We will be in good company though Wink
Source -- http://autonet.ca/Environment/story.cfm?story=/Environment/2006/05/23/1593494-ap.html
Quote:

U.S. Rep. Stephanie Herseth, D-S.D., said she fills up her conventional vehicle with a blend of about 30 percent ethanol and has been happy with its performance.



I think it's not illegal to run an unmodified vehicle on blended E85/gasoline. It's illegal to make modifications to the vehicle; or to operate the vehicle on a fuel which didn't have road taxes paid.

But of course, these are "theortical" illegal things anyways, kind-of like jay-walking. The only difference is that your car dealer will advise you against one, and not the other.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ender



Joined: 12 May 2006
Posts: 15
Location: minneapolis

PostPosted: Sun May 28, 2006 11:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

not to mention with all the negative press from the oil prices/supply issues in the media lately, i'd like to see the politician that would allow the prosecution of people taking the issue into their own garages to move away from oil dependency. talk about campaign suicide.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    E85Forum.com Forum Index -> open forum on E85 ethanol fuel All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group